Buddhist Concept of Being and the Origin of Life
Buddhism sees things from a different perspective. It has its own profound and solid vision of the world and beings in the world. Basically, Buddhism never believes that a creator created the world and beings. The Buddhist perspective is that beings are roaming from one world system to another, from one realm to another. This is very clearly shown in the Aggañña Sutta of the Digha Nikâya. According to Buddhism, beings are born again and again, and die again and again. This is a cycle, which is formally called "samsâra" or the "samsâric cycle". It is clear to everybody that in a cycle, one cannot find a beginning. In many of his wonderful and marvelous discourses delivered throughout the 45 years of his ministry, the Buddha has very clearly and vividly said over and over again, this samsâra is without discoverable beginning. Therefore, the absolute first point of beings cannot be traced.
On the day of attaining his Perfect Enlightenment, the Buddha traced back his previous lives through the special knowledge that he had gained (Pubbe nivâsa anussati ñâna). He recollected one life, two lives, three lives, four lives, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, sixty, seventy, eighty, ninety, hundred, thousand, hundred thousands, millions, billions, trillions, eons and eons of lives, how he lived in the different realms. Then he saw his mother, father, brothers, sisters, and other family members in different existences with him also.
With these foolish thoughts, he went to the Buddha and asked why? The Buddha explained that there was no such bond between the Buddha and him at the time of his ordination. In giving further explanation, the Buddha gave this classic example to him, saying, "Mâlunkyaputta, if anyone would say 'I will not lead the holy life under the Blessed One until the Blessed One declares to me the world is eternal...or after death a Tathâgata neither exists nor does not exist'; that would still remain undeclared by the Tathâgata and meanwhile that person would die.
"Suppose, Mâlunkyaputta, a man were wounded by an arrow thickly smeared with poison, and his friends and companions, his kinsmen and relatives, brought a surgeon to treat him. The man would say: ' I will not let the surgeon pull out this arrow until I know whether the man who wounded me was a noble or a brahman or a merchant or a worker.' And he would say: 'I will not let the surgeon pull out the arrow until I know the name and clan of the man who wounded me; ... until I know whether the man who wounded me was tall or short or of middle height... until I know whether the man who wounded me was dark or brown or golden-skinned.. until I know whether the man who wounded me lives in such a village or town or city... until I know whether the bow that wounded me was a long bow or a crossbow;... until I know whether the bowstring that was wounded me was fiber or reed or sinew or hemp or bark;... until I know whether the shaft that wounded me was wild or cultivate;... until I know with what kind of feathers the shaft that wounded me was fitted-whether those of a vulture or a heron or a hawk or a peacock or a stork;...until I know with what kind of sinew the shaft that wounded me was bound-whether that of an ox or a buffalo or a deer or a monkey;... until I know what kind of arrow it was that wounded me- whether it was hoof-tipped or curved or barbed or calf-toothed or oleander.
"All this would still not be known to that man and meanwhile he would die. So too Mâlunkyaputta, if anyone should say that I would not lead the holy life under the Blessed One until the Blessed One declares to me,' the world is eternal... or after death a Tathâgata neither exists nor does not exist'; that would still remain undeclared by the Tathâgata and meanwhile that person would die.
"Mâlunkyaputta, if there is the view, 'the world is eternal' the holy life cannot be lived, and if there is the view, 'the world is not eternal', the holy life cannot be lived. Whether there is the view 'the world is eternal' or the view 'the world is not eternal'; there is birth, there is ageing, there is death, there is sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, and despair, the destruction of which I prescribe here and now. Therefore, Mâlunkyaputta, remember what I have left undeclared as undeclared and remember what I have declared as declared. And what have I left undeclared: 'The world is eternal'- I have left undeclared. 'The world is not eternal'- I have left undeclared. 'The world is finite' – I have left undeclared. 'The world is infinite'- I have left undeclared. 'The soul is the same as the body'- I have left undeclared. 'The soul is one thing and the body is another'- I have left undeclared. 'After death a Tathâgata exists'- I have left undeclared. 'After death a Tathâgata does not exist'- I have left undeclared. 'After death a Tathâgata both exists and does not exist'- I have left undeclared. 'After death a Tathâgata neither exists not does not exist'- I have left undeclared.
"And what have I declared? 'This is unsatisfactory'- I have declared. 'This is the origin of unsâtisfactoriness'- I have declared. 'This is the cessation of unsâtisfactoriness'- I have declared. 'This is the way leading to the cessation of unsâtisfactoriness'- I have declared.
The word used in Buddhist language (Pâli) for being is "satta". In Sanskrit it is "sakta" meaning, the one who has clung to something. Most Buddhists know well the term "Bodhisatta or "Bodhisatva". Bodhisatta is the one who has clung to the Bodhi, the enlightenment, who has entirely dedicated himself to attain Enlightenment.
Satta as mentioned earlier, means clinging. So, to what does he/she or it cling to? He/she or it has clung to the five aggregates. That is why he/she or it is called satta, being.
So what are the five aggregates?
- Form aggregate
- Feeling aggregate
- Perception aggregate
- Volitional formation aggregate
- Consciousness aggregate
In short, the one who has clung to these five aggregates is called satta or being. There are many different kinds of beings in the world. The Buddha once said that 'beings' was a subject that should not be contemplated upon as it is a vast and endless, subject. Since one cannot reach a conclusion on this subject, our short precious lifespan becomes wasted with this pursuit. Addressing the monks, the Buddha once said, "Monks, just as a stick thrown up into the air falls now on its bottom, now on its top, so too as beings roam and wander on hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving, they go from this world to the other world; they come from the other world to this world, [and] for what reason; because they have not seen the Four Noble Truths."
On one occasion, Ven. Samiddhi went to the Buddha and said, "Venerable Sir, it is said, 'a being, a being'. In what way venerable Sir, might there be 'a being' or the description of a being?" The Buddha replied, "Where there is the eye, Samiddhi, where there are forms, eye consciousness, thing to be cognized by eye-consciousness, there a being exists or the description of a being. Where there is the ear, where there is sound, ear- consciousness, things to be cognized by ear-consciousness, there a being exists or the description of a being. Where there is nose, where there is smell, nose-consciousness, things to be cognized by nose-consciousness, there a being exists or the description of a being. Where there is tongue, where there is taste, tongue-consciousness, things to be cognized by tongue-consciousness, there a being exists or the description of a being. Where there is body Samiddhi, where there are tangibles, body-consciousness, things to be cognized by body-consciousness, there a being exists or the description of a being. Where there is mind Samiddhi, where there are mental phenomena, mind-consciousness, things to be cognized by mind-consciousness, there a being exists or the description of a being."
As the Buddha explains, there is no permanent entity to be called a being, but the existence of different senses, their external bases and respective consciousness. When these are combined well; togetherness of the three (eye, forms, and consciousness) is called contact, dependent on contact feelings come to be, dependent on feelings craving comes to be, dependent of craving attachment comes to be, dependent on attachment existence comes to be, dependent on existence birth comes to be, dependent on birth decay, death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, despair and whole mass of suffering come to be (this is the appearance of a being). So, the arising of this mass of suffering is the arising of a being.
In accordance with the teaching of the Buddha, there is no person to be grasped as 'I' 'my' or 'myself'. Things are interdependent and conditioned. All conditioned things have three characteristics. 1-There is an origination. 2- a cessation, and 3- an ever-changing existence (uppâdo paññâyati, vayo paññâyati, thitassa aññatattam paññâyati).
In this body, every molecule exists for only a moment. It is because of not understanding, not realizing this nature of continual change, that all beings are attached to their body and keep the notion that 'I' exist. They then take as 'this is mine, this I am, this is myself’. However, when one sees five aggregates (being) as they really are through tranquilized mind and insight meditation, one comes to realize and understand that there is no such thing within or without to be grasped as 'I', 'my' or 'myself'; where one realizes that whatever the thing may be, 'it is not mine, not I am, not myself. With that realization, one can realize the nature of existence in the world and beings completely. Then he or she starts to detach from all attachments and lives an unattached life. One such as this, exists neither on the near nor the farther shore; nor both the hither and the farther shore. He, totally un-distressed and unbound, is called an Enlightened One.
Let us all understand this Dhamma and practice it throughout our lifetime, so that we all can realize the three characteristics of existence, dependent origination and the Four Noble Truths as the realization of Nibbâna here in this very life.

